Print these, stick them on your wall, bookmark for quick reference. The most important AI concepts and skills on single pages.
One-page reference cards for the most important AI concepts and skills.
| Cheat sheet | What it covers |
|---|---|
| 10 Commandments of AI | The 10 rules every AI user should follow |
| 25 Common Mistakes | Top 25 beginner mistakes (and how to avoid them) |
| Memory Tricks | All mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated |
| Prompt Formula Cards | The 5-part prompt formula with examples |
| Tool Decision Tree | "I want to ___ → use ___" |
Last reviewed: 2026-08
Print this. Stick it on your wall. Read it weekly.
Never share passwords, bank details, SSN, health records, or sensitive personal data with free AI tools. Assume anything you type may be stored or leaked.
AI hallucinates — confidently states false information. Always verify facts, citations, URLs, and numbers before acting on them or sharing them.
Reading AI output is non-negotiable. If you don't have time to read it, you don't have time to send it.
Disclose AI assistance in academic work, professional deliverables, and creative work where AI did substantial work. Transparency builds trust.
Bad prompt = bad output. Before complaining "AI is stupid," ask: "Did I provide context, format, constraints, and examples?"
AI can draft, suggest, and analyze. You decide. Especially for: hiring, medical, legal, financial, parental decisions.
If you use AI for every task, your skills atrophy. Do important things yourself first; use AI to improve.
No fake reviews, deepfakes, impersonation, or passing AI content as human when context expects human creation.
Different tools are good at different things. Don't use ChatGPT for cited research (use Perplexity). Don't use it for your PDFs (use NotebookLM).
AI doesn't think, feel, or want. It's pattern-matching at scale. Treat it like a brilliant but unreliable intern — useful, but needs supervision.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The top 25 mistakes beginners make with AI — and how to avoid each one.
Mistake: "Help me with my resume"
Fix: Include context, task, format, constraints, examples
Mistake: "Write my resume, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile"
Fix: One task per prompt. Send 3 prompts.
Mistake: "Give me ideas"
Fix: "Give me 10 ideas as a numbered list with one-sentence descriptions"
Mistake: "Summarize this"
Fix: "Summarize in under 200 words"
Mistake: Accepting the first output without iterating
Fix: Always iterate. Ask for revisions, alternatives, improvements.
Mistake: Trusting facts without verification
Fix: Verify important facts with independent sources
Mistake: Assuming cited papers exist
Fix: Search Google Scholar for every citation
Mistake: Sharing links AI provides
Fix: Always click links before sharing — AI invents URLs
Mistake: Treating AI as a professional
Fix: Use AI for learning, see a real professional for advice
Mistake: Asking AI about recent events
Fix: Use Perplexity or Gemini for current information
Mistake: Pasting SSN, bank details, passwords
Fix: Never share personal identifiers with AI tools
Mistake: Pasting proprietary info into free ChatGPT
Fix: Anonymize first, or use enterprise/private tools
Mistake: Letting your data train future models
Fix: Opt out in each tool's privacy settings
Mistake: Pasting coworker/customer data
Fix: Anonymize everyone — "my coworker [A]"
Mistake: Asking AI for emergency help
Fix: Call emergency services. AI is not for crises.
Mistake: Sending AI output you didn't review
Fix: Always read and edit before sending
Mistake: Accepting generic AI tone
Fix: Add your voice. AI sounds generic; you shouldn't.
Mistake: Using ChatGPT when Perplexity or NotebookLM would be better
Fix: Match tool to task (see Tool Decision Tree)
Mistake: Giving up after one bad response
Fix: Rephrase, ask for alternatives, give more context
Mistake: Using AI for tasks you should do yourself
Fix: Maintain your skills. Do important things without AI.
Mistake: Passing AI work as your own
Fix: Disclose when AI did substantial work
Mistake: Fake reviews, impersonation, deepfakes
Fix: Don't use AI to deceive or manipulate
Mistake: AI screening candidates, AI for hiring
Fix: Human review for all decisions about people
Mistake: Not noticing biased AI output
Fix: Watch for bias. Ask for multiple perspectives.
Mistake: Believing AI thinks, feels, or has intentions
Fix: AI is pattern-matching, not thinking. Treat it as a tool.
If you only remember 3:
Last reviewed: 2026-08
All the mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated in one place.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
High stakes Low stakes
Verifiable Use AI + verify Use AI freely
Not verifiable Don't use AI Use AI cautiously
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The 5-part prompt formula, with examples for common tasks.
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Every great prompt has these 5 parts. Memorize this.
Tell AI what perspective to take.
Examples:
- "You are an experienced marketing copywriter"
- "You are a high school teacher explaining to a struggling student"
- "You are a senior software engineer doing code review"
- "You are a friend who's honest but kind"
- "You are a financial advisor explaining to a beginner"
What does AI need to know?
Examples:
- "I'm a freelance designer with 3 years of experience, pitching to a small tech startup"
- "The audience is 50 middle managers at a manufacturing company, most of whom have never used AI"
- "This is for a 5-minute lightning talk, not a 60-minute workshop"
- "I've been struggling with this for 2 weeks"
- "My boss is skeptical of AI"
One clear task per prompt.
Examples:
- "Write a 200-word cold outreach email"
- "Summarize this article in 5 bullet points"
- "Explain quantum computing at 3 levels: 10-year-old, 15-year-old, college student"
- "Critique my resume bullet points and suggest improvements"
- "Generate 10 blog post ideas about [topic]"
How should the output be structured?
Examples:
- "Format as a numbered list"
- "Use a table with columns: Tool, Price, Best for"
- "Write in markdown with H2 headers for each section"
- "Output as JSON with these keys: title, summary, tags"
- "Two columns: Pros | Cons"
What to avoid or limit?
Examples:
- "Under 300 words"
- "Avoid jargon"
- "Don't use the words 'revolutionary' or 'game-changing'"
- "Tone: warm but professional, not corporate"
- "Don't use bullet points only — each section needs prose"
Weak prompt:
"Write a blog post about AI for students"
Strong prompt:
"You are an experienced education writer who's written for The Atlantic and Edutopia. (ROLE) I'm a college student starting a blog about AI for students. (CONTEXT) Write a 600-word blog post titled '5 Ways AI Can Help You Study (Without Doing the Work for You)'. (TASK) Target audience: undergrads who are curious about AI but worried about academic integrity. Format: intro paragraph, 5 numbered sections with H2 headers, conclusion. (FORMAT) Tone: conversational, specific, no hype. Avoid: bullet-point-only sections (each section needs prose), clichés like 'in today's fast-paced world'. (CONSTRAINTS)"
| Task | Format example |
|---|---|
| List | "Numbered list with one-sentence descriptions" |
| Comparison | "Table with columns: A, B, C" |
| How-to | "Step-by-step with H2 headers" |
| "Subject line + body, under 150 words" | |
| Code | "Code block with comments explaining each line" |
| Summary | "3 bullet points + 1-sentence bottom line" |
| Analysis | "SWOT format: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats" |
| Brainstorm | "10 ideas ranked by originality" |
| Constraint type | Example |
|---|---|
| Length | "Under 300 words" / "Exactly 5 paragraphs" |
| Tone | "Warm but professional" / "Casual" / "Academic" |
| Avoid | "No jargon" / "No bullet points only" / "No clichés" |
| Audience | "For a 10-year-old" / "For executives" / "For skeptics" |
| Style | "Like a letter to a friend" / "Like a New Yorker article" |
| Structure | "Problem-solution" / "Before-after" / "Story-driven" |
Add: "Before answering, walk through your reasoning step by step. Then give your final answer."
Add: "Here are 3 examples of what I want: [paste examples]. Now write 5 more in the same style."
Add: "Give me 3 different versions: one formal, one casual, one witty. I'll pick the best."
After getting output: "Now critique this as a harsh editor would. What's weak? What should be cut?"
Last reviewed: 2026-08
"I want to ___ → use ___". A simple decision framework for choosing the right AI tool.
I want to…
│
├── Chat about anything / brainstorm / draft
│ ├── Quickly, casually → ChatGPT
│ ├── Long document (100+ pages) → Claude
│ ├── With web research → Gemini or Perplexity
│ ├── In Bengali → Gemini or Claude
│ └── With Google integration → Gemini
│
├── Research with citations
│ ├── General research → Perplexity
│ ├── Academic papers → Elicit or Consensus
│ ├── My own PDFs → NotebookLM
│ └── Quick fact check → Google + Perplexity
│
├── Write something
│ ├── Draft from scratch → ChatGPT or Claude
│ ├── Improve my writing → Grammarly + ChatGPT
│ ├── Long-form (essay, report) → Claude
│ ├── Creative writing → Claude or ChatGPT
│ └── Non-English → DeepL or ChatGPT
│
├── Summarize
│ ├── A web article → ChatGPT or Perplexity
│ ├── My own PDF → NotebookLM
│ ├── A meeting → Otter.ai
│ ├── A long document → Claude
│ └── Multiple sources → Perplexity Pro
│
├── Make an image
│ ├── Free, easy → Bing Image Creator
│ ├── High quality, artistic → Midjourney
│ ├── With design control → Leonardo
│ ├── Commercial-safe → Adobe Firefly
│ └── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Media
│
├── Make a video
│ ├── Text-to-video → Runway or Pika
│ ├── AI avatar (talking head) → Synthesia
│ ├── Edit by transcript → Descript
│ └── Mobile social content → CapCut
│
├── Make a presentation
│ ├── AI-generated from prompt → Gamma
│ ├── Smart templates → Beautiful.ai
│ ├── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Design
│ └── Inside Microsoft → Copilot
│
├── Write code
│ ├── In my IDE → GitHub Copilot or Cursor
│ ├── Build an app from prompt → Replit Agent
│ ├── Frontend UI → v0
│ ├── Quick snippet → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Free → Codeium
│
├── Translate
│ ├── Best quality → DeepL
│ ├── Most languages → Google Translate
│ ├── With context → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Document → DeepL Pro
│
├── Use voice
│ ├── Voice conversation → ChatGPT Voice Mode
│ ├── Speech-to-text → Otter.ai or Whisper
│ ├── Text-to-speech → ElevenLabs
│ └── Transcribe meeting → Otter.ai
│
├── Automate tasks
│ ├── Simple 2-step → IFTTT
│ ├── Multi-step, many apps → Zapier
│ ├── Complex, visual → Make.com
│ └── Self-hosted → n8n
│
├── Learn something
│ ├── K-12 tutoring → Khanmigo
│ ├── Language → Duolingo Max
│ ├── Custom tutor → ChatGPT (custom GPT)
│ └── From my notes → NotebookLM
│
└── Be more productive
├── Inside Notion → Notion AI
├── Calendar optimization → Motion or Reclaim
├── Task management → Todoist AI
└── Meeting notes → Otter.ai
For most people, 2 tools cover 90% of needs:
If you use AI heavily, add:
More than 5 tools = you're probably overcomplicating.
| Aspect | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Versatility, ecosystem | Long documents, writing | Real-time info, Google |
| Context window | ~128K tokens | ~200K tokens | ~1M tokens (Pro) |
| Free tier | Limited | Limited | Generous |
| Image generation | Yes (DALL·E) | No | Yes (Imagen) |
| Voice mode | Yes (advanced) | No | Yes |
| Web access | Yes (paid) | Limited | Yes (real-time) |
Switch when:
- You hit usage limits on your current tool
- You need a capability your tool lacks
- Quality drops on specific task types
- You need real-time information
Don't switch just because:
- A new tool launched (most are hype)
- Your friend uses something different
- You're bored
Most AI tools are "good enough" for most tasks. The differences between ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are smaller than marketing suggests.
Don't optimize for the "best" tool. Pick one, learn it deeply, and only switch when you hit a real limitation.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
One-page reference cards for the most important AI concepts and skills.
| Cheat sheet | What it covers |
|---|---|
| 10 Commandments of AI | The 10 rules every AI user should follow |
| 25 Common Mistakes | Top 25 beginner mistakes (and how to avoid them) |
| Memory Tricks | All mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated |
| Prompt Formula Cards | The 5-part prompt formula with examples |
| Tool Decision Tree | "I want to ___ → use ___" |
Last reviewed: 2026-08
Print this. Stick it on your wall. Read it weekly.
Never share passwords, bank details, SSN, health records, or sensitive personal data with free AI tools. Assume anything you type may be stored or leaked.
AI hallucinates — confidently states false information. Always verify facts, citations, URLs, and numbers before acting on them or sharing them.
Reading AI output is non-negotiable. If you don't have time to read it, you don't have time to send it.
Disclose AI assistance in academic work, professional deliverables, and creative work where AI did substantial work. Transparency builds trust.
Bad prompt = bad output. Before complaining "AI is stupid," ask: "Did I provide context, format, constraints, and examples?"
AI can draft, suggest, and analyze. You decide. Especially for: hiring, medical, legal, financial, parental decisions.
If you use AI for every task, your skills atrophy. Do important things yourself first; use AI to improve.
No fake reviews, deepfakes, impersonation, or passing AI content as human when context expects human creation.
Different tools are good at different things. Don't use ChatGPT for cited research (use Perplexity). Don't use it for your PDFs (use NotebookLM).
AI doesn't think, feel, or want. It's pattern-matching at scale. Treat it like a brilliant but unreliable intern — useful, but needs supervision.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The top 25 mistakes beginners make with AI — and how to avoid each one.
Mistake: "Help me with my resume"
Fix: Include context, task, format, constraints, examples
Mistake: "Write my resume, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile"
Fix: One task per prompt. Send 3 prompts.
Mistake: "Give me ideas"
Fix: "Give me 10 ideas as a numbered list with one-sentence descriptions"
Mistake: "Summarize this"
Fix: "Summarize in under 200 words"
Mistake: Accepting the first output without iterating
Fix: Always iterate. Ask for revisions, alternatives, improvements.
Mistake: Trusting facts without verification
Fix: Verify important facts with independent sources
Mistake: Assuming cited papers exist
Fix: Search Google Scholar for every citation
Mistake: Sharing links AI provides
Fix: Always click links before sharing — AI invents URLs
Mistake: Treating AI as a professional
Fix: Use AI for learning, see a real professional for advice
Mistake: Asking AI about recent events
Fix: Use Perplexity or Gemini for current information
Mistake: Pasting SSN, bank details, passwords
Fix: Never share personal identifiers with AI tools
Mistake: Pasting proprietary info into free ChatGPT
Fix: Anonymize first, or use enterprise/private tools
Mistake: Letting your data train future models
Fix: Opt out in each tool's privacy settings
Mistake: Pasting coworker/customer data
Fix: Anonymize everyone — "my coworker [A]"
Mistake: Asking AI for emergency help
Fix: Call emergency services. AI is not for crises.
Mistake: Sending AI output you didn't review
Fix: Always read and edit before sending
Mistake: Accepting generic AI tone
Fix: Add your voice. AI sounds generic; you shouldn't.
Mistake: Using ChatGPT when Perplexity or NotebookLM would be better
Fix: Match tool to task (see Tool Decision Tree)
Mistake: Giving up after one bad response
Fix: Rephrase, ask for alternatives, give more context
Mistake: Using AI for tasks you should do yourself
Fix: Maintain your skills. Do important things without AI.
Mistake: Passing AI work as your own
Fix: Disclose when AI did substantial work
Mistake: Fake reviews, impersonation, deepfakes
Fix: Don't use AI to deceive or manipulate
Mistake: AI screening candidates, AI for hiring
Fix: Human review for all decisions about people
Mistake: Not noticing biased AI output
Fix: Watch for bias. Ask for multiple perspectives.
Mistake: Believing AI thinks, feels, or has intentions
Fix: AI is pattern-matching, not thinking. Treat it as a tool.
If you only remember 3:
Last reviewed: 2026-08
All the mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated in one place.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
High stakes Low stakes
Verifiable Use AI + verify Use AI freely
Not verifiable Don't use AI Use AI cautiously
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The 5-part prompt formula, with examples for common tasks.
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Every great prompt has these 5 parts. Memorize this.
Tell AI what perspective to take.
Examples:
- "You are an experienced marketing copywriter"
- "You are a high school teacher explaining to a struggling student"
- "You are a senior software engineer doing code review"
- "You are a friend who's honest but kind"
- "You are a financial advisor explaining to a beginner"
What does AI need to know?
Examples:
- "I'm a freelance designer with 3 years of experience, pitching to a small tech startup"
- "The audience is 50 middle managers at a manufacturing company, most of whom have never used AI"
- "This is for a 5-minute lightning talk, not a 60-minute workshop"
- "I've been struggling with this for 2 weeks"
- "My boss is skeptical of AI"
One clear task per prompt.
Examples:
- "Write a 200-word cold outreach email"
- "Summarize this article in 5 bullet points"
- "Explain quantum computing at 3 levels: 10-year-old, 15-year-old, college student"
- "Critique my resume bullet points and suggest improvements"
- "Generate 10 blog post ideas about [topic]"
How should the output be structured?
Examples:
- "Format as a numbered list"
- "Use a table with columns: Tool, Price, Best for"
- "Write in markdown with H2 headers for each section"
- "Output as JSON with these keys: title, summary, tags"
- "Two columns: Pros | Cons"
What to avoid or limit?
Examples:
- "Under 300 words"
- "Avoid jargon"
- "Don't use the words 'revolutionary' or 'game-changing'"
- "Tone: warm but professional, not corporate"
- "Don't use bullet points only — each section needs prose"
Weak prompt:
"Write a blog post about AI for students"
Strong prompt:
"You are an experienced education writer who's written for The Atlantic and Edutopia. (ROLE) I'm a college student starting a blog about AI for students. (CONTEXT) Write a 600-word blog post titled '5 Ways AI Can Help You Study (Without Doing the Work for You)'. (TASK) Target audience: undergrads who are curious about AI but worried about academic integrity. Format: intro paragraph, 5 numbered sections with H2 headers, conclusion. (FORMAT) Tone: conversational, specific, no hype. Avoid: bullet-point-only sections (each section needs prose), clichés like 'in today's fast-paced world'. (CONSTRAINTS)"
| Task | Format example |
|---|---|
| List | "Numbered list with one-sentence descriptions" |
| Comparison | "Table with columns: A, B, C" |
| How-to | "Step-by-step with H2 headers" |
| "Subject line + body, under 150 words" | |
| Code | "Code block with comments explaining each line" |
| Summary | "3 bullet points + 1-sentence bottom line" |
| Analysis | "SWOT format: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats" |
| Brainstorm | "10 ideas ranked by originality" |
| Constraint type | Example |
|---|---|
| Length | "Under 300 words" / "Exactly 5 paragraphs" |
| Tone | "Warm but professional" / "Casual" / "Academic" |
| Avoid | "No jargon" / "No bullet points only" / "No clichés" |
| Audience | "For a 10-year-old" / "For executives" / "For skeptics" |
| Style | "Like a letter to a friend" / "Like a New Yorker article" |
| Structure | "Problem-solution" / "Before-after" / "Story-driven" |
Add: "Before answering, walk through your reasoning step by step. Then give your final answer."
Add: "Here are 3 examples of what I want: [paste examples]. Now write 5 more in the same style."
Add: "Give me 3 different versions: one formal, one casual, one witty. I'll pick the best."
After getting output: "Now critique this as a harsh editor would. What's weak? What should be cut?"
Last reviewed: 2026-08
"I want to ___ → use ___". A simple decision framework for choosing the right AI tool.
I want to…
│
├── Chat about anything / brainstorm / draft
│ ├── Quickly, casually → ChatGPT
│ ├── Long document (100+ pages) → Claude
│ ├── With web research → Gemini or Perplexity
│ ├── In Bengali → Gemini or Claude
│ └── With Google integration → Gemini
│
├── Research with citations
│ ├── General research → Perplexity
│ ├── Academic papers → Elicit or Consensus
│ ├── My own PDFs → NotebookLM
│ └── Quick fact check → Google + Perplexity
│
├── Write something
│ ├── Draft from scratch → ChatGPT or Claude
│ ├── Improve my writing → Grammarly + ChatGPT
│ ├── Long-form (essay, report) → Claude
│ ├── Creative writing → Claude or ChatGPT
│ └── Non-English → DeepL or ChatGPT
│
├── Summarize
│ ├── A web article → ChatGPT or Perplexity
│ ├── My own PDF → NotebookLM
│ ├── A meeting → Otter.ai
│ ├── A long document → Claude
│ └── Multiple sources → Perplexity Pro
│
├── Make an image
│ ├── Free, easy → Bing Image Creator
│ ├── High quality, artistic → Midjourney
│ ├── With design control → Leonardo
│ ├── Commercial-safe → Adobe Firefly
│ └── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Media
│
├── Make a video
│ ├── Text-to-video → Runway or Pika
│ ├── AI avatar (talking head) → Synthesia
│ ├── Edit by transcript → Descript
│ └── Mobile social content → CapCut
│
├── Make a presentation
│ ├── AI-generated from prompt → Gamma
│ ├── Smart templates → Beautiful.ai
│ ├── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Design
│ └── Inside Microsoft → Copilot
│
├── Write code
│ ├── In my IDE → GitHub Copilot or Cursor
│ ├── Build an app from prompt → Replit Agent
│ ├── Frontend UI → v0
│ ├── Quick snippet → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Free → Codeium
│
├── Translate
│ ├── Best quality → DeepL
│ ├── Most languages → Google Translate
│ ├── With context → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Document → DeepL Pro
│
├── Use voice
│ ├── Voice conversation → ChatGPT Voice Mode
│ ├── Speech-to-text → Otter.ai or Whisper
│ ├── Text-to-speech → ElevenLabs
│ └── Transcribe meeting → Otter.ai
│
├── Automate tasks
│ ├── Simple 2-step → IFTTT
│ ├── Multi-step, many apps → Zapier
│ ├── Complex, visual → Make.com
│ └── Self-hosted → n8n
│
├── Learn something
│ ├── K-12 tutoring → Khanmigo
│ ├── Language → Duolingo Max
│ ├── Custom tutor → ChatGPT (custom GPT)
│ └── From my notes → NotebookLM
│
└── Be more productive
├── Inside Notion → Notion AI
├── Calendar optimization → Motion or Reclaim
├── Task management → Todoist AI
└── Meeting notes → Otter.ai
For most people, 2 tools cover 90% of needs:
If you use AI heavily, add:
More than 5 tools = you're probably overcomplicating.
| Aspect | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Versatility, ecosystem | Long documents, writing | Real-time info, Google |
| Context window | ~128K tokens | ~200K tokens | ~1M tokens (Pro) |
| Free tier | Limited | Limited | Generous |
| Image generation | Yes (DALL·E) | No | Yes (Imagen) |
| Voice mode | Yes (advanced) | No | Yes |
| Web access | Yes (paid) | Limited | Yes (real-time) |
Switch when:
- You hit usage limits on your current tool
- You need a capability your tool lacks
- Quality drops on specific task types
- You need real-time information
Don't switch just because:
- A new tool launched (most are hype)
- Your friend uses something different
- You're bored
Most AI tools are "good enough" for most tasks. The differences between ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are smaller than marketing suggests.
Don't optimize for the "best" tool. Pick one, learn it deeply, and only switch when you hit a real limitation.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
One-page reference cards for the most important AI concepts and skills.
| Cheat sheet | What it covers |
|---|---|
| 10 Commandments of AI | The 10 rules every AI user should follow |
| 25 Common Mistakes | Top 25 beginner mistakes (and how to avoid them) |
| Memory Tricks | All mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated |
| Prompt Formula Cards | The 5-part prompt formula with examples |
| Tool Decision Tree | "I want to ___ → use ___" |
Last reviewed: 2026-08
Print this. Stick it on your wall. Read it weekly.
Never share passwords, bank details, SSN, health records, or sensitive personal data with free AI tools. Assume anything you type may be stored or leaked.
AI hallucinates — confidently states false information. Always verify facts, citations, URLs, and numbers before acting on them or sharing them.
Reading AI output is non-negotiable. If you don't have time to read it, you don't have time to send it.
Disclose AI assistance in academic work, professional deliverables, and creative work where AI did substantial work. Transparency builds trust.
Bad prompt = bad output. Before complaining "AI is stupid," ask: "Did I provide context, format, constraints, and examples?"
AI can draft, suggest, and analyze. You decide. Especially for: hiring, medical, legal, financial, parental decisions.
If you use AI for every task, your skills atrophy. Do important things yourself first; use AI to improve.
No fake reviews, deepfakes, impersonation, or passing AI content as human when context expects human creation.
Different tools are good at different things. Don't use ChatGPT for cited research (use Perplexity). Don't use it for your PDFs (use NotebookLM).
AI doesn't think, feel, or want. It's pattern-matching at scale. Treat it like a brilliant but unreliable intern — useful, but needs supervision.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The top 25 mistakes beginners make with AI — and how to avoid each one.
Mistake: "Help me with my resume"
Fix: Include context, task, format, constraints, examples
Mistake: "Write my resume, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile"
Fix: One task per prompt. Send 3 prompts.
Mistake: "Give me ideas"
Fix: "Give me 10 ideas as a numbered list with one-sentence descriptions"
Mistake: "Summarize this"
Fix: "Summarize in under 200 words"
Mistake: Accepting the first output without iterating
Fix: Always iterate. Ask for revisions, alternatives, improvements.
Mistake: Trusting facts without verification
Fix: Verify important facts with independent sources
Mistake: Assuming cited papers exist
Fix: Search Google Scholar for every citation
Mistake: Sharing links AI provides
Fix: Always click links before sharing — AI invents URLs
Mistake: Treating AI as a professional
Fix: Use AI for learning, see a real professional for advice
Mistake: Asking AI about recent events
Fix: Use Perplexity or Gemini for current information
Mistake: Pasting SSN, bank details, passwords
Fix: Never share personal identifiers with AI tools
Mistake: Pasting proprietary info into free ChatGPT
Fix: Anonymize first, or use enterprise/private tools
Mistake: Letting your data train future models
Fix: Opt out in each tool's privacy settings
Mistake: Pasting coworker/customer data
Fix: Anonymize everyone — "my coworker [A]"
Mistake: Asking AI for emergency help
Fix: Call emergency services. AI is not for crises.
Mistake: Sending AI output you didn't review
Fix: Always read and edit before sending
Mistake: Accepting generic AI tone
Fix: Add your voice. AI sounds generic; you shouldn't.
Mistake: Using ChatGPT when Perplexity or NotebookLM would be better
Fix: Match tool to task (see Tool Decision Tree)
Mistake: Giving up after one bad response
Fix: Rephrase, ask for alternatives, give more context
Mistake: Using AI for tasks you should do yourself
Fix: Maintain your skills. Do important things without AI.
Mistake: Passing AI work as your own
Fix: Disclose when AI did substantial work
Mistake: Fake reviews, impersonation, deepfakes
Fix: Don't use AI to deceive or manipulate
Mistake: AI screening candidates, AI for hiring
Fix: Human review for all decisions about people
Mistake: Not noticing biased AI output
Fix: Watch for bias. Ask for multiple perspectives.
Mistake: Believing AI thinks, feels, or has intentions
Fix: AI is pattern-matching, not thinking. Treat it as a tool.
If you only remember 3:
Last reviewed: 2026-08
All the mnemonics from the 30-day course, aggregated in one place.
Verify. Don't share personal info. Read before sending. Disclose. Improve your prompts. Don't delegate judgment. Protect your skills. Don't deceive. Choose the right tool. AI is a tool, not a person.
High stakes Low stakes
Verifiable Use AI + verify Use AI freely
Not verifiable Don't use AI Use AI cautiously
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Last reviewed: 2026-08
The 5-part prompt formula, with examples for common tasks.
[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]
Every great prompt has these 5 parts. Memorize this.
Tell AI what perspective to take.
Examples:
- "You are an experienced marketing copywriter"
- "You are a high school teacher explaining to a struggling student"
- "You are a senior software engineer doing code review"
- "You are a friend who's honest but kind"
- "You are a financial advisor explaining to a beginner"
What does AI need to know?
Examples:
- "I'm a freelance designer with 3 years of experience, pitching to a small tech startup"
- "The audience is 50 middle managers at a manufacturing company, most of whom have never used AI"
- "This is for a 5-minute lightning talk, not a 60-minute workshop"
- "I've been struggling with this for 2 weeks"
- "My boss is skeptical of AI"
One clear task per prompt.
Examples:
- "Write a 200-word cold outreach email"
- "Summarize this article in 5 bullet points"
- "Explain quantum computing at 3 levels: 10-year-old, 15-year-old, college student"
- "Critique my resume bullet points and suggest improvements"
- "Generate 10 blog post ideas about [topic]"
How should the output be structured?
Examples:
- "Format as a numbered list"
- "Use a table with columns: Tool, Price, Best for"
- "Write in markdown with H2 headers for each section"
- "Output as JSON with these keys: title, summary, tags"
- "Two columns: Pros | Cons"
What to avoid or limit?
Examples:
- "Under 300 words"
- "Avoid jargon"
- "Don't use the words 'revolutionary' or 'game-changing'"
- "Tone: warm but professional, not corporate"
- "Don't use bullet points only — each section needs prose"
Weak prompt:
"Write a blog post about AI for students"
Strong prompt:
"You are an experienced education writer who's written for The Atlantic and Edutopia. (ROLE) I'm a college student starting a blog about AI for students. (CONTEXT) Write a 600-word blog post titled '5 Ways AI Can Help You Study (Without Doing the Work for You)'. (TASK) Target audience: undergrads who are curious about AI but worried about academic integrity. Format: intro paragraph, 5 numbered sections with H2 headers, conclusion. (FORMAT) Tone: conversational, specific, no hype. Avoid: bullet-point-only sections (each section needs prose), clichés like 'in today's fast-paced world'. (CONSTRAINTS)"
| Task | Format example |
|---|---|
| List | "Numbered list with one-sentence descriptions" |
| Comparison | "Table with columns: A, B, C" |
| How-to | "Step-by-step with H2 headers" |
| "Subject line + body, under 150 words" | |
| Code | "Code block with comments explaining each line" |
| Summary | "3 bullet points + 1-sentence bottom line" |
| Analysis | "SWOT format: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats" |
| Brainstorm | "10 ideas ranked by originality" |
| Constraint type | Example |
|---|---|
| Length | "Under 300 words" / "Exactly 5 paragraphs" |
| Tone | "Warm but professional" / "Casual" / "Academic" |
| Avoid | "No jargon" / "No bullet points only" / "No clichés" |
| Audience | "For a 10-year-old" / "For executives" / "For skeptics" |
| Style | "Like a letter to a friend" / "Like a New Yorker article" |
| Structure | "Problem-solution" / "Before-after" / "Story-driven" |
Add: "Before answering, walk through your reasoning step by step. Then give your final answer."
Add: "Here are 3 examples of what I want: [paste examples]. Now write 5 more in the same style."
Add: "Give me 3 different versions: one formal, one casual, one witty. I'll pick the best."
After getting output: "Now critique this as a harsh editor would. What's weak? What should be cut?"
Last reviewed: 2026-08
"I want to ___ → use ___". A simple decision framework for choosing the right AI tool.
I want to…
│
├── Chat about anything / brainstorm / draft
│ ├── Quickly, casually → ChatGPT
│ ├── Long document (100+ pages) → Claude
│ ├── With web research → Gemini or Perplexity
│ ├── In Bengali → Gemini or Claude
│ └── With Google integration → Gemini
│
├── Research with citations
│ ├── General research → Perplexity
│ ├── Academic papers → Elicit or Consensus
│ ├── My own PDFs → NotebookLM
│ └── Quick fact check → Google + Perplexity
│
├── Write something
│ ├── Draft from scratch → ChatGPT or Claude
│ ├── Improve my writing → Grammarly + ChatGPT
│ ├── Long-form (essay, report) → Claude
│ ├── Creative writing → Claude or ChatGPT
│ └── Non-English → DeepL or ChatGPT
│
├── Summarize
│ ├── A web article → ChatGPT or Perplexity
│ ├── My own PDF → NotebookLM
│ ├── A meeting → Otter.ai
│ ├── A long document → Claude
│ └── Multiple sources → Perplexity Pro
│
├── Make an image
│ ├── Free, easy → Bing Image Creator
│ ├── High quality, artistic → Midjourney
│ ├── With design control → Leonardo
│ ├── Commercial-safe → Adobe Firefly
│ └── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Media
│
├── Make a video
│ ├── Text-to-video → Runway or Pika
│ ├── AI avatar (talking head) → Synthesia
│ ├── Edit by transcript → Descript
│ └── Mobile social content → CapCut
│
├── Make a presentation
│ ├── AI-generated from prompt → Gamma
│ ├── Smart templates → Beautiful.ai
│ ├── Inside Canva → Canva Magic Design
│ └── Inside Microsoft → Copilot
│
├── Write code
│ ├── In my IDE → GitHub Copilot or Cursor
│ ├── Build an app from prompt → Replit Agent
│ ├── Frontend UI → v0
│ ├── Quick snippet → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Free → Codeium
│
├── Translate
│ ├── Best quality → DeepL
│ ├── Most languages → Google Translate
│ ├── With context → ChatGPT or Claude
│ └── Document → DeepL Pro
│
├── Use voice
│ ├── Voice conversation → ChatGPT Voice Mode
│ ├── Speech-to-text → Otter.ai or Whisper
│ ├── Text-to-speech → ElevenLabs
│ └── Transcribe meeting → Otter.ai
│
├── Automate tasks
│ ├── Simple 2-step → IFTTT
│ ├── Multi-step, many apps → Zapier
│ ├── Complex, visual → Make.com
│ └── Self-hosted → n8n
│
├── Learn something
│ ├── K-12 tutoring → Khanmigo
│ ├── Language → Duolingo Max
│ ├── Custom tutor → ChatGPT (custom GPT)
│ └── From my notes → NotebookLM
│
└── Be more productive
├── Inside Notion → Notion AI
├── Calendar optimization → Motion or Reclaim
├── Task management → Todoist AI
└── Meeting notes → Otter.ai
For most people, 2 tools cover 90% of needs:
If you use AI heavily, add:
More than 5 tools = you're probably overcomplicating.
| Aspect | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Versatility, ecosystem | Long documents, writing | Real-time info, Google |
| Context window | ~128K tokens | ~200K tokens | ~1M tokens (Pro) |
| Free tier | Limited | Limited | Generous |
| Image generation | Yes (DALL·E) | No | Yes (Imagen) |
| Voice mode | Yes (advanced) | No | Yes |
| Web access | Yes (paid) | Limited | Yes (real-time) |
Switch when:
- You hit usage limits on your current tool
- You need a capability your tool lacks
- Quality drops on specific task types
- You need real-time information
Don't switch just because:
- A new tool launched (most are hype)
- Your friend uses something different
- You're bored
Most AI tools are "good enough" for most tasks. The differences between ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are smaller than marketing suggests.
Don't optimize for the "best" tool. Pick one, learn it deeply, and only switch when you hit a real limitation.
Last reviewed: 2026-08
AI Educator · Open-Source Advocate · Curriculum Designer
On a mission to close the AI literacy gap for non-technical people — students, teachers, freelancers, small business owners, senior citizens — across South Asia and beyond. AI should empower everyone, not just engineers.
Have feedback or want to contribute? Open an issue on GitHub or reach out directly.